Bill details come from the Michigan Legislature’s pages; reported claim cases come from the news coverage listed under Sources.
It has happened. Local 4 in Detroit reported that GEICO denied a crash claim and canceled a policy because a household member, a 12-year-old who does not drive, was not listed. Two pending bills, Senate Bill 782 and Senate Bill 1153, would stop insurers from doing that. Neither is law yet.
Key Findings
- Two bills pending: Senate Bill 782 (introduced February 11, 2026) and Senate Bill 1153 (introduced September 9, 2026), both sponsored by Sen. Mallory McMorrow, sit in the Michigan Senate Committee on Finance, Insurance, and Consumer Protection.
- Neither is law: no effective date exists. A committee referral is an early stage, and many insurance bills never advance.
- Who is affected: reported cases involve household members left off the policy or the PIP attestation, including young children who do not drive. Whether a denial holds up depends on the policy language and the facts.
- What to do now: check what your insurer requires you to list, ask in writing if it is unclear, and file a complaint with the Michigan Department of Insurance and Financial Services if a claim was denied.
Navigate This Guide
What is happening in Michigan car insurance law?
Two bills in the Michigan Senate target denials over unlisted household members. Senate Bill 782, introduced February 11, 2026, would prohibit denying a no-fault claim because not every household member was listed on the policy. Senate Bill 1153, introduced September 9, 2026, would also bar canceling or rescinding a policy, or taking other coverage-detrimental action, based solely on a failure to disclose a resident relative who joins the household during the policy term. Both were referred to the Senate Committee on Finance, Insurance, and Consumer Protection the day they were filed. Neither has received a floor vote.
The proposals followed investigative reporting by Local 4 in Detroit. Its first report described a Washtenaw County couple whose GEICO claim was questioned after a Christmas Eve crash because their infant and toddler were not listed. A follow-up described a Southfield-area mother whose GEICO claim was denied, and whose policy was canceled back to her last renewal date, after a crash because her 12-year-old daughter, a passenger, was not listed. Senate Bill 782 amends Section 3114 of Michigan’s Insurance Code of 1956, the section on who receives personal protection insurance (PIP) benefits and in what order. Senate Bill 1153 would add a new Section 2116c. As Insurance Business describes Senate Bill 1153, insurers could still request resident-relative information at application and renewal under set conditions, but could not require disclosure of relatives who join the household mid-term.
Can Michigan car insurance deny my claim if I didn’t list my teenager?
In practice, some insurers have. We did not find a Michigan statute that spells out this consequence. In the reported cases, GEICO pointed to the household-listing requirement tied to PIP coverage, and the denials rested on the insurer’s reading of the application or attestation and the policy terms. Whether a given denial or cancellation is valid is a question for the policy language, the facts and, if disputed, a court.
The bills would change that outcome. If enacted, an insurer could no longer deny a claim solely because a household member was not listed, and under Senate Bill 1153 could not cancel or rescind a policy solely because a resident relative who joined the household during the policy term was not disclosed. The bills do not stop insurers from asking about household members. They limit the consequence when someone is not listed.
What current Michigan law allows
- Claim denial: some insurers have denied claims when a household member was not listed. GEICO’s reported position is that all household residents must be listed, regardless of age.
- Policy cancellation: in the GEICO case Local 4 reported, the policy was canceled retroactive to the last renewal date after the crash claim was reviewed.
- Practice varies by insurer: Progressive reportedly told one couple that only children of driving age needed to be listed.
What Senate Bill 782 and 1153 would change
- No denial for non-listing alone: the insurer could not deny a claim solely because a household member was not listed (both bills).
- No cancellation or rescission for mid-term non-disclosure alone: the insurer could not void the policy solely because a resident relative who joined the household during the policy term was not disclosed (Senate Bill 1153).
- Disclosure still allowed: under Senate Bill 1153 the insurer could still ask for resident-relative information at application and renewal, within set conditions.
What should Michigan drivers do now?
Until the law changes, the steps below reflect what insurers currently ask of policyholders. None of them guarantees a claim will be paid. They reduce the risk that an unlisted household member becomes the reason a claim is denied.
- Review your auto policy and list every household member your insurer requires. Open the declarations page and the driver section. Confirm who the insurer expects you to list: some have said every resident regardless of age, others only drivers. Include adult children who have moved back in.
- Report household changes when your policy says to, not after a crash. Check your policy and renewal notice for when changes must be reported, and when someone moves in or a child is born, tell the insurer promptly. Waiting until after an accident is where many disputes begin.
- Ask your insurer, in writing, how undisclosed household members are handled. A written answer creates a record and forces the insurer to state its position in its own words. Ask specifically whether the policy contains an exclusion for undisclosed resident relatives.
- If a claim has been denied or a policy canceled, file a complaint with the Michigan Department of Insurance and Financial Services. DIFS accepts complaints online and by phone. A complaint does not guarantee a reversal, but it puts the dispute on the regulator’s record.
- Compare quotes from other insurers before your next renewal. A driver who has been non-renewed or denied can still shop. Rates and underwriting rules vary by insurer. If your premium rises after a not-at-fault crash, our guide to how rates can rise after a crash that wasn’t your fault walks through the questions to ask.
Compare coverage before your next renewal
See how your current policy compares with quotes from other insurers. No pressure, no obligation.
GET YOUR CAR INSURANCE QUOTESWhy is this happening in Michigan?
GEICO told ClickOnDetroit that, because of Michigan’s PIP requirements, all household residents must be listed on the policy regardless of age, and it said it complies with state insurance regulations. Insurers generally treat household composition as an underwriting factor, because who lives in the home and can access the vehicle affects the risk. The lawmakers behind the bills say the rule is being used to deny claims that should be covered, including when the unlisted person, such as a child, was not driving.
Local 4’s reporting focused on families with a baby, a toddler or a 12-year-old who did not drive, and who said they did not know such children had to be listed. The gap between what insurers require and what households understand as a driver is at the center of both proposals.
What happens next
Both bills remain in committee. As of October 15, 2026, the Legislature’s bill pages showed only the introduction, referral and co-sponsor additions (Sens. Cavanagh and Hertel on Senate Bill 782, Sen. Bayer on Senate Bill 1153). Committee referral is an early stage, and many bills do not advance. If either bill is reported out of committee, it would go to the full Senate, and if it passes there, to the House. We found no committee hearing scheduled.
How we verified this
We checked the Michigan Legislature’s pages for Senate Bill 782 and Senate Bill 1153 for sponsors, the Insurance Code sections involved, committee referral and history. We read Local 4’s January 2026 report on the GEICO case, Jalopnik’s account of the insurers’ stated positions, and Insurance Business’s September 2026 description of Senate Bill 1153. Descriptions of the bills’ provisions beyond their titles and the Legislature’s summaries rely on that reporting, so check the bill text itself for exact wording. We could not confirm whether either bill will receive a hearing.
Frequently Asked Questions About the Michigan Unlisted Driver Bills
Does the Michigan bill apply to my current policy right now?
No. Neither bill has passed, so nothing has changed for policies in force today. Some insurers have denied claims and canceled policies over household members who were not listed, and the bills would restrict that only if they are enacted.
What can I do if my claim was denied because my teenager wasn’t listed?
You can file a complaint with the Michigan Department of Insurance and Financial Services (DIFS). The department accepts complaints online and by phone. You can also ask your insurer in writing how the policy applies to undisclosed household members, and compare quotes from other insurers before your next renewal. If the dispute is about the payout amount rather than the coverage decision itself, our guide to disputing a total loss settlement offer covers the valuation steps.
The Bottom Line
Some Michigan insurers have denied claims and canceled policies because a household member was not listed. Two pending bills, Senate Bill 782 and Senate Bill 1153, would restrict that, but neither is law today. Until they are, the safest step is to find out exactly who your insurer requires you to list, get that answer in writing, and update the insurer when your household changes.
The bills themselves are early in the legislative process. Committee referral does not guarantee a vote. Drivers can follow the status on the Michigan Legislature’s bill pages, and those who believe a non-disclosure denial was wrong can file a complaint with DIFS or consult an attorney.
Sources
- Michigan Legislature, Senate Bill 782 of 2026, introduced February 11, 2026 (amends MCL 500.3114).
- Michigan Legislature, Senate Bill 1153 of 2026, introduced September 9, 2026 (adds Section 2116c).
- ClickOnDetroit, GEICO denies crash claim, sues Michigan mom for not listing 12-year-old on car insurance policy, January 18, 2026.
- Jalopnik, Have Children Too Young To Drive? List Them On Your Michigan Car Insurance Policy…Or Else, 2026.
- Insurance Business, Michigan bill would bar auto insurer undisclosed-resident penalties, September 16, 2026.
Last updated: